
Revista investigación, desarrollo educación, servicio, trabajo
Vol 1 – No 2 July - December 2021 e-ISSN 2745-1194. Carta al editor
peers; people in grieve for the death of one or more relatives by Covid-19, linked by
ties of presence, absence or feelings of guilt concerning the fact of infecting a relative
who has already passed away or in danger of death; people with mild mental illnesses
background whose mental pathologies enhanced the incidence and chronicity, with a
diagnosis of depression, borderline personality disorder (BPD), bipolar disorders,
panic attack, among others; older adults in conditions of neglect or abuse; women
victims of sexual abuse or domestic violence and those who have a background of
suicidal behaviour that could relapse because of the tensions and crisis derived from
the pandemic (BBC, 2020a, 2020b, 2021a; OPS, 2020).
According to the above exposed and based on the worrying mental health situation
that the pandemic has generated, people affected by this type of problem need
continuous support in different aspects. It is important to note that State institutions
and NGOs must be part of the community to identify derived conflicts. At the same
time, they should be part of the construction of intervention measures, which embrace
thoughts, ideas, experiences, learning, and possible solutions to other emerging
difficulties from a cultural point of view.
Consequently, the community can provide contextualized solutions to these problems.
Such a problem-solving process enables communities to think critically and generate
theory, experience, and practice in a dialogical way. It will allow them to create
collective solutions with the help of those who have previously experienced related
emotional consequences.
In this problem and others that seriously affect society, it is necessary that the research
carried out by universities manages to identify the causes, processes, and
consequences associated with motivating, maintaining, and triggering events. Such
recognition and in-depth study can allow a much broader vision of the phenomenon,
a greater academic reflection on the problem leading to building proposals, programs,
projects, and intervention measures to reduce the high incidence of the phenomenon.
It should also aim at increasing the effectiveness of the intervention proposals
generated in an interdisciplinary way.
Therefore, it requires collaboration not only with the victims but the community in
general. The community can also become more active in hospitality, protecting those
at risk, and generating protective measures according to the context in which the
problems emerge and the risks they bring with them (Ayuso-Mateos et al., 2012; OMS,
2014).
Looking at problems of this type should exhaust the efforts to describe the issue. It
should also try to expand its field of analysis towards preventive intervention. For
example, preparing response measures before the situation happens, during the event,
and when the event is over. This description is what Social and Human Sciences call
primary prevention, secondary prevention, and tertiary prevention.
This type of prevention is applied by all disciplines, especially those with a social focus
and care for vulnerable people and groups. Its effectiveness lies in articulating all
preventive interventions to the context, the social and cultural elements that shape the
phenomenon itself, and the explanations that account for its particularities. This