
La revista investigación, desarrollo educación, servicio, trabajo
Vol 2 – No 2 July - December 2022 e-ISSN 2745-1194 Pag 24-51
to measure territorial competence applied as the READI matrix that allows
participation in the territory, from a geographical component. For this it is crucial that
each country has its regulations. But the instrument must contemplate the context
where it is developed, or if the unification of actors that allow continuous and
permanent validation. In what was done by Vaca, Reinoso, Guerrero, & Torres (2020),
in Ecuador it is established what is the difference of an articulated model that
recognizes diversity, multiculturalism, gender respect, this because ethnic actions, we
start this argument from the development of a dialogue of actors that correspond on
the value of educational quality in basic primary and secondary educational
institutions. For Bolívar (2018), the process of institutional self-assessment recognizes
in internal improvement which is the role of the opposites, the objectives, scope and
associated dynamics, the self-assessment seen from different contexts, explaining
what is the value of the levels and functions where you want to organize what are the
terms that value the attitude and relationship necessary for it to work in
educationalterms. According to Ravela, (2020), the self-assessment process
establishes continuous improvement mechanisms where reality is applied from how
identifying aspects of continuous improvement provide school value and how the time
in which these realities are measured are the moments of decision making. Each value
that enters the institutional metrics makes the educational community participate in
the recognition of pros and cons of the institution.
However, with the generation of instruments and guidelines for quality assurance in
educational establishments, application strategies are consolidated for educational
institutions. According to Martínez, M., Ramírez, S., Henao, G., & Rodríguez, S.
(2018), there is a model that year after year is established in the institutional
argumentation, where recognition is proposed from the Institutional self-assessment
in basic and secondary education in Colombia, period 1994 to 2014. As an exercise, as
work and strategy for the establishment of the General Law of Education in 1994, the
first approach develops opportunities on how to improve the institutions that offer
academic programs, from models and pedagogical strategies, a value that is
established with the work of continuous improvement; for Calderón, M., & Rodriguez,
A. (2020), institutional self-assessment from the voices of the subjects. José María
Carbonell and El Venado (Rural Zone), the Preschool and basic primary levels work,
and for the preparation of this report, Guide 34 of the MEN, the institutional
documents, in particular the PEI and the Institutional Self-assessment, are analyzed.
The study carried out by Rodríguez Maritza 2018, from the Externado de Colombia